claimroutineinferred_dep
Leaf occurrence bound and count partition
Statement (paper)
In every leaf of the tree, each variable occurs at most times. Moreover, each satisfying assignment of the input formula satisfies exactly one leaf formula, so the sum of the leaf counts equals the input count.
In plain English
In every leaf of the sparsification tree, each variable occurs at most times. Also, each satisfying assignment of the input formula satisfies exactly one leaf formula, so the leaf counts sum to the input count.
Why it's here
The occurrence bound follows from the choice of in the previous claim, which turns the leaf degree bound into the stated . The count identity follows from the branching lemma's partition property, which makes children split the parent's satisfying assignments, so counting at the leaves loses nothing. Together these give the occurrence and counting guarantees of the main sparsification lemma.
Classified routine:
Direct bookkeeping consequence of the earlier choice of M (claim-lem-sparsify-4) and the partition property of the branching rule (lem-spar-branch), in the style of the Impagliazzo–Paturi–Zane sparsification lemma's leaf analysis.
Uses
Used by
Nothing in the paper
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §A.3 The size of the tree
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
main_full_version.tex:3855
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Leaf occurrence bound and count partition" rests on claim-lem-sparsify-4
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Leaf occurrence bound and count partition" rests on lem:spar-branch