claimroutineinferred_dep
Theta-null height matches Pazuki theta height
Shows theta-null height equals Pazuki theta height up to
links theta-null map to Pazuki's height
Claim·§4.4 Comparison of base height and Faltings height·inside lemBase height bounded by Faltings height
Statement (paper)
Fix an even level and put . Then there is a constant , depending on but not on the fiber or its field of definition, such that the projective height of the theta-null map at (the point with coordinates , , equivalently , ) differs from Pazuki's theta height of by at most .
In plain English
For even level and , the projective height of the theta-null point , equivalently , differs from Pazuki's theta height of the fiber by at most a constant independent of and its field of definition.
Why it's here
This identifies the height of the theta-null map, which is defined via the algebraic theta data from the previous claim, with Pazuki's theta height up to a bounded error. It is what lets the later claims bound the base height of in terms of the Faltings height, since Pazuki's theta height is comparable to the Faltings height of .
Classified routine:
This comparison follows from the standard relations among theta-null coordinates (the Riemann/isogeny theta relations between and ) together with Pazuki's definition of the theta height. It amounts to bookkeeping that identifies two projective embeddings up to a bounded height difference.
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §4.4 Comparison of base height and Faltings height
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/04-height.tex:405
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Theta-null map height equals Pazuki theta height up to constant" rests on claim-hei-base-height-1