claimstandardinferred_dep
Theta height bounded by Faltings height
Bounds theta height by
last link to the Faltings height
Claim·§4.4 Comparison of base height and Faltings height·inside lemBase height bounded by Faltings height
Statement (paper)
There is a constant , independent of the point and its field of definition, such that on the open where the theta data are defined. Here is Pazuki's exact theta height and is the stable Faltings height, which differs from the Deligne-normalized height by the fixed constant for these surfaces.
In plain English
Where the theta data are defined, Pazuki's theta height of the surface satisfies , with independent of the point and its field of definition. Here is the stable Faltings height, which equals the Deligne-normalized up to the fixed constant for these surfaces.
Why it's here
This is the Pazuki comparison step that converts the theta height into the Faltings height. Chained with the previous claim, which bounds by , it gives the inequality of the parent lemma. The normalization shift is absorbed into the constant , so the Deligne and stable conventions can be used interchangeably.
Classified standard:
Pazuki's comparison between the theta height and the stable Faltings height of principally polarized abelian varieties (Pazuki, 'Theta height and Faltings height', 2012), applied directly here; the shift between the Deligne and stable normalizations is a fixed constant absorbed into .
Uses
Used by
Nothing in the paper
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §4.4 Comparison of base height and Faltings height
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/04-height.tex:514
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Pazuki comparison of theta and Faltings heights" rests on claim-hei-base-height-4