claimroutineinferred_dep
Few primes with large common order factor
Bounds primes sharing an order factor by + small
shows bad common-factor primes are rare
Statement (paper)
Fix one index , and let be the number of primes in the interval satisfying for which the two orders have a common odd factor . Then , with implied constants independent of .
In plain English
For a fixed index , the number of primes in the given interval satisfying the residue conditions whose two reduction orders share an odd factor is , with constants independent of .
Why it's here
This bounds the primes that must be discarded because their two reduction orders have a large common odd factor, which the order-structure claim confines to primes with and . The count uses the upper sieve with the lower bound on to save a factor of , and summing over gives the saving. Taking large then ensures some prime pattern survives, which is used by the next claim on surviving patterns satisfying the order conditions.
Classified routine:
A standard sieve count: it applies the paper's elementary upper sieve (pri-upper-sieve) and the lower bound on G(Z) to the extra congruence conditions l | r+1 and l | a, then sums over l > L. This is the usual bookkeeping for bounding exceptional primes and needs no new idea.
Uses
Used by
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §6.5 Counting bad prime values
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/06-primes.tex:550
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Bound on bad prime values with large common factor" rests on pri:upper-sieve
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Bound on bad prime values with large common factor" rests on claim-pri-pattern-4
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Bound on bad prime values with large common factor" rests on claim-pri-pattern-1