claimroutineinferred_dep
Canonical height comparison bounds root indices
Bounds by a constant using quadratic canonical height growth
linear versus quadratic growth gives finiteness
Statement (paper)
The quantity is bounded by an ordinary constant depending only on (and the fixed curve and point ). More precisely, for each nonzero , while with , so a maximizing nonzero index in yields for ordinary constants .
In plain English
The quantity is bounded by a constant depending only on (and the fixed curve and point ). The reason is that for each nonzero , while with , so a maximizing nonzero index gives .
Why it's here
This is the height contradiction's key step: the uniform height bound from the previous claim makes the height of the point attached to each root linear in , while the canonical height of multiples of grows quadratically in the index. Comparing linear and quadratic growth at a maximizing index forces to be bounded by an ordinary constant. That finiteness is what the next claim needs to conclude that the root coordinates are ordinary integers.
Classified routine:
Direct comparison of linear growth from the previous claim's height bound against the standard quadratic growth of the Néron–Tate canonical height, h(x(nP)) = 2ĥ(P)n² + O(1) (Silverman, The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves); a standard linear-versus-quadratic bounding argument.
Uses
Used by
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §2.7 The height contradiction
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/02-reduction.tex:842
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Canonical height comparison bounds root indices" rests on claim-red-finite-test-success-3