claimroutineinferred_dep
Right-factor charge via actual incoming cap
Right-port escape charge is ≤ times right child's witness discrepancy
charges the right factor via the incoming cap
Claim·§9.3 Witness envelopes and escaped paths·inside lemEscape contribution charged to child discrepancies
Statement (paper)
For a fixed guessed variant and a two-factor path , after the measure-preserving change of variables, the right-port contribution is at most a constant times
where the middle inequality uses only the incoming cap of the actual left port relation , and the right task's tuple does not depend on the old source .
In plain English
For a fixed guessed variant and a two-factor path , after the measure-preserving change of variables, the right-port contribution to the escape charge is at most a constant times , the right child's witness discrepancy.
Why it's here
Following the previous claim, which bounds the escape indicator by powers of witness discrepancies, this step charges the right-port term to the right child's discrepancy. The sum over the old source is removed by the incoming cap of the actual left port relation, which is possible because the right task's tuple does not depend on . The result is the factor times the metric discrepancy, which the later claims then convert into the bounds.
Classified routine:
This is a direct bookkeeping step inside the escape lemma. It swaps the order of summation and uses the incoming cap of the left port relation to drop the sum over . That rewrites the term as the right child's witness discrepancy, using the measure-preserving variants from lem-env-variants and the bound from claim-lem-fp-escape-1.
Uses
Used by
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §9.3 Witness envelopes and escaped paths
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/fingerprints.tex:388
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Right-factor charge via actual incoming cap" rests on claim-lem-fp-escape-1