claimroutineinferred_dep

Right-factor charge via actual incoming cap

Right-port escape charge is ≤ CfuC\frac fu times right child's witness discrepancy
charges the right factor via the incoming cap
Claim·§9.3 Witness envelopes and escaped paths·inside lemEscape contribution charged to child discrepancies

Statement (paper)

For a fixed guessed variant and a two-factor path x→z→yx\to z\to y, after the measure-preserving change of variables, the right-port contribution is at most a constant times 1NE∑xXu(x)u∑z:(x,z)∈PLacZf(z)∑y:Ya′(y)=1∣eR(z,y)∣s≤KcNuE∑zZf(z)∑y:Ya′(y)=1∣eR(z,y)∣s=Kcfu df,a′(WRac,WRcl)s,\frac1N\mathbb E\sum_x\frac{X_u(x)}u\sum_{z:(x,z)\in\mathcal P^{\mathrm{ac}}_L}Z_f(z)\sum_{y:Y_{a'}(y)=1}|e_R(z,y)|^s \le\frac{K_c}{N u}\mathbb E\sum_z Z_f(z)\sum_{y:Y_{a'}(y)=1}|e_R(z,y)|^s =K_c\frac f u\,\mathfrak d_{f,a'}(W_R^{\mathrm{ac}},W_R^{\mathrm{cl}})^s, where the middle inequality uses only the incoming cap of the actual left port relation PLac\mathcal P^{\mathrm{ac}}_L, and the right task's tuple does not depend on the old source xx.

In plain English

For a fixed guessed variant and a two-factor path x→z→yx\to z\to y, after the measure-preserving change of variables, the right-port contribution to the escape charge is at most a constant times fu df,a′(WRac,WRcl)s\frac f u\,\mathfrak d_{f,a'}(W_R^{\mathrm{ac}},W_R^{\mathrm{cl}})^s, the right child's witness discrepancy.

Why it's here

Following the previous claim, which bounds the escape indicator by powers of witness discrepancies, this step charges the right-port term to the right child's discrepancy. The sum over the old source xx is removed by the incoming cap KcK_c of the actual left port relation, which is possible because the right task's tuple does not depend on xx. The result is the factor Kcf/uK_c f/u times the metric discrepancy, which the later claims then convert into the 2−p2Cdλm2^{-p}2^{Cd}\lambda_m bounds.
Classified routine:
This is a direct bookkeeping step inside the escape lemma. It swaps the order of summation and uses the incoming cap KcK_c of the left port relation to drop the sum over xx. That rewrites the term as the right child's witness discrepancy, using the measure-preserving variants from lem-env-variants and the bound from claim-lem-fp-escape-1.

Sources

PaperOpen
Section
§9.3 Witness envelopes and escaped paths
Page
—
Label
—
Line
sections/fingerprints.tex:388
Leannot aligned

Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.

Friction

  • info
    inferred_dep
    outline: "Right-factor charge via actual incoming cap" rests on claim-lem-fp-escape-1