claimroutineinferred_dep
Coupling plus clean bound gives target
Coupling bound plus clean bound gives total error at most
final triangle-inequality step of the coupling proof
Statement (paper)
Since , one has , which is uniformly as small as required after the same minimum-size padding. Hence, by the triangle inequality, adding the coupling bound to the spare clean active bound, for example , gives an error at most ; the inactive target bounds are the previously fixed bounded-range bounds.
In plain English
Because , the coupling factor satisfies , which is as small as needed after minimum-size padding. Adding this coupling bound to the spare clean active bound (e.g. ) gives total error at most , while inactive target bounds are the previously fixed bounded-range ones.
Why it's here
This closes the coupled induction: the clean active bounds from the earlier claim and the recurrence-closing choice of give a tiny coupling discrepancy, and a triangle inequality turns clean estimate plus discrepancy into the target error bound for the actual tables and vectors. It is the final step of the proposition, converting actual-versus-clean closeness into the stated error guarantee.
Classified routine:
A direct consequence of the earlier claims (clean active bounds and the constant choices closing the coupling recurrence), finished with a triangle inequality and the observation that the coupling factor is small. It is bookkeeping, not a new idea.
Uses
Used by
Nothing in the paper
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §9.5 Closing the coupled induction
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/fingerprints.tex:693
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Coupling plus clean bound gives target" rests on claim-prop-fp-coupling-1
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Coupling plus clean bound gives target" rests on claim-prop-fp-coupling-3