claimroutineinferred_dep
Low-cost derivatives vanish along curve
Shows derivatives of of cost ≤ vanish identically along
converts high order at points into vanishing along the curve
Statement (paper)
Assume that fails. Then for every sufficiently large integer the nonzero polynomial satisfies for all multi-indices with , where is the commuting frame on .
In plain English
If the curve inequality fails, then for all large the nonzero auxiliary polynomial has vanishing identically on for every multi-index with , where is the commuting frame on .
Why it's here
This is the step of the contradiction argument that turns the high -order of at the prescribed points (from the previous claim) into vanishing of many derivatives along the whole curve . The failure of the curve inequality leaves more contact with than the degree of can accommodate, so each derivative of cost at most must vanish on . The later claims use this vanishing to find a persistent component constraining normal bases and to build the fiber polynomial.
Classified routine:
This follows from the preceding auxiliary-polynomial claim by a standard zero-counting argument on a curve: after a low-cost derivative, the remaining prescribed vanishing would exceed the degree bound unless that derivative vanished identically on C.
Uses
Used by
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §2.2 The curve inequality
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/interpolation.tex:268
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Low-cost derivatives vanish along curve" rests on claim-geom-curve-inequality-1