propositionroutineinferred_dep

Angular polynomial local smoothing bound

Angular polynomials of degree MM obey a bound L(N)1/p+L(M)AL(N)^{1/p}+L(M)^A
bounds the selected pieces in the angular proof
Proposition·prop:angular-band·§B The sharp logarithm with angular regularity

Statement (paper)

For N≥2N\ge2 and an angular polynomial f∈Lp(Rn)f\in L^p(\RR^n) of degree at most MM, ∥U(t)ΠNf∥Lp(I×Rn)≲[L(N)1/p+L(M)A]∥f∥p,∥U(t)ΠNf∥Lp,∞(I×Rn)≲L(M)A∥f∥p.\begin{aligned} \|U(t)\Pi_N f\|_{L^p(I\times\RR^n)} &\lesssim [L(N)^{1/p}+L(M)^A]\|f\|_p,\\ \|U(t)\Pi_N f\|_{L^{p,\infty}(I\times\RR^n)} &\lesssim L(M)^A\|f\|_p . \end{aligned} The constants are independent of MM and NN.

In plain English

For N≥2N\ge2 and a function f∈Lp(Rn)f\in L^p(\RR^n) that is an angular polynomial of degree at most MM, the norm ∥U(t)ΠNf∥Lp(I×Rn)\|U(t)\Pi_N f\|_{L^p(I\times\RR^n)} is at most a constant times [L(N)1/p+L(M)A]∥f∥p[L(N)^{1/p}+L(M)^A]\|f\|_p. The weak-type Lp,∞L^{p,\infty} norm is bounded by L(M)A∥f∥pL(M)^A\|f\|_p, with constants independent of MM and NN.

Why it's here

This proposition says that angular regularity of the data removes the NN-dependence of the logarithmic loss in the weak-type bound and leaves it only as L(N)1/pL(N)^{1/p} in the strong bound, with the rest depending on MM alone. It is proved by combining the small-ball estimate (Lemma B.3) near the origin with the pointwise angular envelope (Lemma B.4) away from it, and the annulus theorem supplies the base bound. Later steps use it for the strong and weak bounds on the selected pieces in the angular argument.
Classified routine:
Obtained by combining the paper's earlier small-ball estimate (Lemma B.3) near the origin with the angular envelope bound (Lemma B.4) away from it, using the annulus theorem as the base bound. This is a decomposition-and-assembly argument in an appendix refinement.

Sources

PaperOpen
Section
§B The sharp logarithm with angular regularity
Page
—
Label
prop:angular-band
Line
sections/angular.tex:33
Leannot aligned

Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.

Friction

  • info
    inferred_dep
    "the unrestricted annular estimate gives both conclusions" when H>N^eta refers to the one-frequency-annulus estimate of Theorem 1.2