claimroutineinferred_dep
Construction runs in polynomial time
Reduction runs in deterministic polynomial time, left vertices
efficiency part of the lemma
Claim·§A.1 A simple strong-left form of Unique Games·inside lemUnique Games with constant left degree and strong satisfaction
Statement (paper)
If bounds the explicit size of , then and . The retained graph has left vertices and edges per left vertex, and its identifiers, the rational arithmetic used for rounding, and its permutation tables have polynomial bit length over the fixed alphabet inherited from ; hence the construction is computable in deterministic polynomial time.
In plain English
If bounds the explicit size of , then and , and the retained graph has left vertices with edges each. Its identifiers, rounding arithmetic and permutation tables have polynomial bit length, so is computable in deterministic polynomial time.
Why it's here
This is the efficiency part of the reduction in the lemma: since , , , and are fixed constants, the vertex count is polynomial in the input. Together with the completeness step (the distinct-tag graph is strongly satisfied on YES instances), it shows the construction is a legitimate polynomial-time reduction from 3SAT.
Classified routine:
Standard polynomial-time size and bit-length bookkeeping for a reduction with fixed constants h, ζ, ν, d, H, applied to the construction of the earlier claims.
Uses
Used by
Nothing in the paper
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §A.1 A simple strong-left form of Unique Games
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:221
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Construction is polynomial size" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-6