Friction report

Where the sources disagree or the structure was guessed, ranked. 83 items · 3 warn · 80 info. In v1 these are paper-internal; Lean-vs-paper rows arrive in Phase 2.

paper statements
33
Lean declarations (Phase 2)
—
aligned pairs
—
friction items
83
SeverityKindNodeNoteSource
warnunresolved_ref
Proof rests on the external Khot–Minzer–Safra Grassmann expansion theorem (cited, not a skeleton statement).
sections/04-matrix.tex:33
warnunresolved_ref
Bound on influential coordinates per right vertex is imported from Guruswami et al. Lemma 4.3.
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:242
warnunresolved_ref
Key step is the external vector-valued invariance theorem (Guruswami et al. Thm 10.1 / Isaksson–Mossel).
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:515
infoinferred_dep
critique: The proof of Lemma 3.1 uses Eq. (latent-base-detection) at sections/02-latent.tex:739-740. That equation is derived in running text from "Proposition  gives the bound" (line 653). The lemma node has no edge to the proposition.
sections/02-latent.tex:8
infoinferred_dep
The proof verifies the "nonproportionality condition" and "alignment condition", which are the two parts of the definition of a generic subspace.
sections/02-latent.tex:256
infostructure_uncertain
The base detection bound (eq. latent-base-detection) deriving from this proposition is argued in running text (lines 639-654) outside any proof environment, then used in the proof of lem:latent.
sections/02-latent.tex:534
infostructure_uncertain
No proof in paper; imported from Håstad's Theorem 5.4.
sections/03-game.tex:25
infoinferred_dep
critique: Proposition 5.3 concludes that "the projected advice experiment with β=k^{-2/3} has local strategies" (sections/04-matrix.tex:220-222). That experiment is exactly Definition 5.2.
sections/04-matrix.tex:197
infoinferred_dep
the proof refers to "the ordinary shortcode equality tests" at fixed (U,T), which are the tests of the inverse shortcode theorem
sections/04-matrix.tex:244
infoinferred_dep
critique: The statement of Lemma 5.7 (sections/04-matrix.tex:552) says "of the joint data D in Definition ". The definition is currently flagged as an orphan.
sections/04-matrix.tex:543
infoinferred_dep
critique: The statement of Lemma 5.8 (sections/04-matrix.tex:678) begins "Fix joint data satisfying Lemma ". This dependency exists only on a child claim, not on the lemma node itself.
sections/04-matrix.tex:676
infostructure_uncertain
No proof in paper; it is Dinur–Steurer Corollary 1.2.
sections/05-clean.tex:26
infoinferred_dep
critique: Lemma 6.2 bounds agreement "in the advice experiment". Its proof setup (sections/05-clean.tex:66-86) recalls the advice experiment of Section 5, which is Definition 5.2.
sections/05-clean.tex:88
infoinferred_dep
critique: The proof (sections/07-consequences.tex:92-94, 117-119) uses "the formulation above" and "the nonempty simple game supplied above". That formulation is Lemma A.1, introduced at lines 55-62. The edge exists only on child claims.
sections/07-consequences.tex:64
infoinferred_dep
The proof uses the Gram data and the atom bound α, which are supplied by Lemma A.3 ("the data of Lemma "); that reference sits in the statement, not as a linked \ref.
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:515
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Alphabet-independent gap fixes repetition exponent" rests on lem:unweighted-subdivision
sections/06-finish.tex:93
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Choosing the cube k and parity error" rests on lem:projected-tv
sections/06-finish.tex:136
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Choosing the cube k and parity error" rests on lem:clean
sections/06-finish.tex:136
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Choosing the cube k and parity error" rests on claim-thm-ugc-2
sections/06-finish.tex:136
infoinferred_dep
outline: "YES and NO values of the final game" rests on thm:repetition
sections/06-finish.tex:176
infoinferred_dep
outline: "YES and NO values of the final game" rests on claim-thm-ugc-1
sections/06-finish.tex:176
infoinferred_dep
outline: "YES and NO values of the final game" rests on claim-thm-ugc-3
sections/06-finish.tex:176
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Output is simple bipartite translation game" rests on lem:unweighted-subdivision
sections/06-finish.tex:204
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Polynomial-time explicit encoding" rests on lem:unweighted-subdivision
sections/06-finish.tex:216
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Enlarged noise preserves small change probability" rests on claim-lem-latent-1
sections/02-latent.tex:701
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Enlarged noise preserves small change probability" rests on claim-lem-latent-2
sections/02-latent.tex:701
infoinferred_dep
outline: "High-rank families restrict onto B and detect" rests on prop:latent-full-lift-detection
sections/02-latent.tex:711
infoinferred_dep
outline: "High-rank families restrict onto B and detect" rests on claim-lem-latent-2
sections/02-latent.tex:711
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Generic non-membership over function field" rests on claim-lem-latent-generic-2
sections/02-latent.tex:294
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Specialization via polynomial zero bound" rests on claim-lem-latent-generic-1
sections/02-latent.tex:337
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Specialization via polynomial zero bound" rests on claim-lem-latent-generic-3
sections/02-latent.tex:337
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Fresh isomorphisms make genericity typical" rests on lem:latent-generic
sections/02-latent.tex:547
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Fresh isomorphisms make genericity typical" rests on lem:latent-lift-factorization
sections/02-latent.tex:547
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Expected harmonic rank drop per level" rests on lem:latent-block-kernel
sections/02-latent.tex:579
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Expected harmonic rank drop per level" rests on claim-prop-latent-full-lift-detection-1
sections/02-latent.tex:579
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Rank survives with probability half, leaf detection" rests on claim-prop-latent-full-lift-detection-2
sections/02-latent.tex:600
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Matrix chart lift has Grassmann retention eta/4" rests on claim-thm-shortcode-1
sections/04-matrix.tex:88
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Expansion interval yields row-column slice" rests on claim-thm-shortcode-2
sections/04-matrix.tex:109
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Shortcode contradiction forces large good set" rests on claim-lem-good-row-advice-1
sections/04-matrix.tex:396
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Shortcode contradiction forces large good set" rests on claim-lem-good-row-advice-2
sections/04-matrix.tex:396
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Lower bound g_0 on good advice mass" rests on claim-lem-good-row-advice-3
sections/04-matrix.tex:407
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Slice correlation with nontrivial restriction" rests on lem:projected-witness
sections/04-matrix.tex:688
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Fourier mass on indicated frequency coset" rests on claim-lem-fourier-coset-decoding-1
sections/04-matrix.tex:712
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Decoded vector lands in projected answer set" rests on claim-lem-fourier-coset-decoding-2
sections/04-matrix.tex:737
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Decoded vector lands in projected answer set" rests on lem:good-row-advice
sections/04-matrix.tex:737
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Clean coordinates have ordinary question law" rests on claim-lem-clean-1
sections/05-clean.tex:123
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Conditioned clean pairs are independent game questions" rests on claim-lem-clean-2
sections/05-clean.tex:141
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Each side reconstructs its advice input" rests on claim-lem-clean-3
sections/05-clean.tex:167
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Conditional agreement bounded by repeated game" rests on claim-lem-clean-4
sections/05-clean.tex:202
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Averaging over binomial clean count" rests on claim-lem-clean-5
sections/05-clean.tex:223
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Averaging over binomial clean count" rests on claim-lem-clean-2
sections/05-clean.tex:223
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Fixed-instance verifier gap from strong-left UG" rests on lem:simple-strong-left
sections/07-consequences.tex:89
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Fixed-instance verifier gap from strong-left UG" rests on claim-cor-raghavendra-consequence-1
sections/07-consequences.tex:89
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Rational approximation of local law" rests on claim-cor-raghavendra-consequence-2
sections/07-consequences.tex:98
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Explicit polynomial occurrence list" rests on lem:simple-strong-left
sections/07-consequences.tex:117
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Explicit polynomial occurrence list" rests on claim-cor-raghavendra-consequence-3
sections/07-consequences.tex:117
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Rationalization changes optimum by under eta/2" rests on claim-cor-raghavendra-consequence-2
sections/07-consequences.tex:145
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Rationalization changes optimum by under eta/2" rests on claim-cor-raghavendra-consequence-3
sections/07-consequences.tex:145
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Rationalization changes optimum by under eta/2" rests on claim-cor-raghavendra-consequence-4
sections/07-consequences.tex:145
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Copy normalization to unit incident weight" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-1
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:69
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Copy normalization to unit incident weight" rests on thm:ugc
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:69
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Rounding weights into unweighted multigraph" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-2
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:103
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Tagged right copies preserve value" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-3
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:124
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Full sequence graph value below 3nu/4" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-4
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:142
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Distinct-tag graph simple, YES strongly satisfied" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-3
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:184
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Distinct-tag graph simple, YES strongly satisfied" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-4
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:184
infoinferred_dep
outline: "NO soundness of retained graph" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-5
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:210
infoinferred_dep
outline: "NO soundness of retained graph" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-6
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:210
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Construction is polynomial size" rests on claim-lem-simple-strong-left-6
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:221
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Pseudorandom vertices have local payoff bound" rests on claim-prop-finite-ordering-transfer-2
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:737
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Nonpseudorandom excess decodes to game labeling" rests on claim-prop-finite-ordering-transfer-3
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:805
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Nonpseudorandom excess decodes to game labeling" rests on claim-prop-finite-ordering-transfer-4
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:805
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Conditioning on distinct neighbors gives strict gap" rests on claim-prop-finite-ordering-transfer-1
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:852
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Conditioning on distinct neighbors gives strict gap" rests on claim-prop-finite-ordering-transfer-5
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:852
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Parameter choices give final ordering gap" rests on lem:ordering-collision
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:904
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Parameter choices give final ordering gap" rests on lem:ordering-rounding
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:904
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Parameter choices give final ordering gap" rests on claim-prop-finite-ordering-transfer-6
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:904
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Explicit rational encoding is polynomial" rests on claim-prop-finite-ordering-transfer-6
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:945
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Common Gaussian ensemble matching local moments" rests on lem:ordering-local-data
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:557
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Influence and tail hypotheses for invariance" rests on claim-lem-ordering-rounding-1
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:576
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Lipschitz payoff gives R-independent invariance error" rests on claim-lem-ordering-rounding-2
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:623
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Lipschitz payoff gives R-independent invariance error" rests on claim-lem-ordering-rounding-3
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:623
infoinferred_dep
outline: "Gaussian side is a random q-assignment" rests on claim-lem-ordering-rounding-4
appendices/finite-consequences.tex:642