claimroutine
Effective choice of latent and shortcode parameters
Chooses , , , , , and effectively
first batch of fixed parameters
Statement (paper)
Given the rational budgets, one can effectively choose positive rational parameters and , the latent rank threshold from Lemma , , shortcode parameters (with a positive rational lower bound), and a sufficiently large as in Equation , together with latent data with computable rational noise law and a splitting , , by terminating deterministic constructions; here the thresholds, including once is fixed, are supplied by the effective assertions of Lemma and the effective bounds after Theorem .
In plain English
Given the rational error budgets, all parameters of the final reduction can be chosen effectively: , , the threshold , , shortcode parameters (a positive rational lower bound) and , and a large enough . The latent data with computable rational noise law and a splitting , , can also be built by terminating deterministic procedures.
Why it's here
This claim makes the parameter choices in the final reduction computable, so the reduction is deterministic and polynomial-time with constants depending only on . It does this by feeding the budget into the latent gadget lemma to get and the noise data. It then sets from and takes the shortcode theorem's and from that , and fixes large enough for both. The next step, choosing the cube and parity error, builds on these fixed parameters.
Classified routine:
Parameter bookkeeping: it chains the effective thresholds supplied by the latent gadget lemma (lem-latent) and the effective bounds after the inverse shortcode theorem (thm-shortcode) to make each choice computable. No new idea is involved.
Uses
Used by
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §7.2 The final reduction
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/06-finish.tex:114
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.