theoremnovelstructure_uncertain

Height bounded by radical of contact primes

Bounds height of ss by HMS(s)cH M_S(s)^c off five exceptional points
polynomial height bound by contact primes
Theorem·hei:height·§2.2 Contact primes and ordinary integer witnesses

Statement (paper)

There exist five distinct points C⊂P1(Q)\mathcal C\subset\mathbf P^1(\Q), including ∞\infty, a finite set SS of rational primes, and constants H,c>0H,c>0 with the following property. For each b∈Cb\in\mathcal C, choose a primitive integral linear form Lb(U,V)L_b(U,V) vanishing at bb, with L∞(U,V)=VL_\infty(U,V)=V. For s=(u:v)∈P1(Q)∖Cs=(u:v)\in\mathbf P^1(\Q)\setminus\mathcal C, let MS(s)M_S(s) be the product, taken without repetition, of primes q∉Sq\notin S for which at least one of the integers vq(Lb(u,v))−min⁡{vq(u),vq(v)},b∈C, v_q(L_b(u,v))-\min\{v_q(u),v_q(v)\},\qquad b\in\mathcal C, is odd. Here vq(q)=1v_q(q)=1 and vq(0)=+∞v_q(0)=+\infty. Then h(s)≤HMS(s)c. \hgt(s)\le H M_S(s)^c.

In plain English

There is a five-point set C⊂P1(Q)\mathcal C\subset\mathbf P^1(\Q) containing ∞\infty, a finite set SS of primes, and constants H,c>0H,c>0 such that every rational point s=(u:v)s=(u:v) outside C\mathcal C has h(s)≤HMS(s)c\hgt(s)\le H M_S(s)^c. Here MS(s)M_S(s) is the product of primes q∉Sq\notin S at which some vq(Lb(u,v))−min⁡{vq(u),vq(v)}v_q(L_b(u,v))-\min\{v_q(u),v_q(v)\}, for b∈Cb\in\mathcal C, is odd.

Why it's here

The set C\mathcal C is the branch locus of the rational Shimura curve quotient, and the abelian surface family over it has bad behavior governed by C\mathcal C. The proof bounds the Faltings height of the fiber by a polynomial in MM, using CM boundedness or modularity and isogeny comparison in the non-CM case. It then applies hei-base-height to turn this into a bound on h(s)\hgt(s). The result says that a rational point of large height must have many primes where some Lb(u,v)L_b(u,v) has odd valuation, which is the ordinary-integer witness input for later results such as the enlarged-exception corollary and the uniform height bound for ring elements.
Classified novel:
The key new arithmetic input: it bounds the height of a rational point by a power of the radical of its odd-valuation contact primes, using a rational Shimura curve quotient branched at five points, Faltings heights of the fibre abelian surfaces, CM boundedness, modularity and isogeny estimates. No prior result supplies such a polynomial radical bound tied to this specific five-point branch locus.

Inside the proof

Figures

A proof-flow diagram of six boxes connected by arrows. The left column starts with varying $A\in R$ and choosing a representation at precision $K$ with slopes $\widetilde s_i$, then passes to local analysis at each prime $q\mid M_K(\widetilde s_i)$ (pole parity and coarsening), then to the paired elliptic tests giving $v_q(\widetilde a-\eta(a))\ge K$. The right column keeps the root tuple fixed with nonzero $\delta=f(\eta(\mathbf a))$ bounded by $C_fB^D$; an arrow labeled 'polynomial evaluation' and an arrow from the tests feed a box concluding $M_K(\widetilde s_i)^K\mid\delta$. A final wide box applies the five-point height estimate to get $h(\widetilde A)\ll_f B$ uniformly for $A\in R$.
Figure 1diagramp. 16
The use of one nonzero δ\delta for every A∈RA\in R. All slopes shown come from the representation chosen at the fixed ordinary precision KK, and MKM_K uses the fixed exceptional set for KK. The comparison holds for every a∈Ra\in R, so it applies to the fixed root tuple. The implied constant in the final bound is ordinary and independent of AA and a\mathbf a.
What it shows
A proof-flow diagram of six boxes connected by arrows. The left column starts with varying A∈RA\in R and choosing a representation at precision KK with slopes s~i\widetilde s_i, then passes to local analysis at each prime q∣MK(s~i)q\mid M_K(\widetilde s_i) (pole parity and coarsening), then to the paired elliptic tests giving vq(a~−η(a))≥Kv_q(\widetilde a-\eta(a))\ge K. The right column keeps the root tuple fixed with nonzero δ=f(η(a))\delta=f(\eta(\mathbf a)) bounded by CfBDC_fB^D; an arrow labeled 'polynomial evaluation' and an arrow from the tests feed a box concluding MK(s~i)K∣δM_K(\widetilde s_i)^K\mid\delta. A final wide box applies the five-point height estimate to get h(A~)≪fBh(\widetilde A)\ll_f B uniformly for A∈RA\in R.
Read from the image by claude-opus-5.5 · confidence 85%

Sources

PaperOpen
Section
§2.2 Contact primes and ordinary integer witnesses
Page
—
Label
hei:height
Line
sections/02-reduction.tex:232
Leannot aligned

Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.

Friction

  • info
    structure_uncertain
    The proof environment is a 11-line completion; the actual argument (curve construction, family, CM/non-CM cases, modularity, Jacobian height, isogeny) is spread over unlabeled text throughout Section 4, outlined as claims under hei:height.
  • info
    structure_uncertain
    claim "Quaternionic curve quotient is P^1 with five rational branch values" (sections/04-height.tex:43-172) lies outside the recorded proof; a second proof or an appendix
  • info
    structure_uncertain
    claim "Abelian surface family with B-action and isogenous conjugates" (sections/04-height.tex:177-280) lies outside the recorded proof; a second proof or an appendix
  • info
    structure_uncertain
    claim "CM fibers have uniformly bounded Faltings height" (sections/04-height.tex:622-680) lies outside the recorded proof; a second proof or an appendix
  • info
    structure_uncertain
    claim "Non-CM case: B-linear quasi-isogenies and sign cocycle" (sections/04-height.tex:682-764) lies outside the recorded proof; a second proof or an appendix
  • info
    structure_uncertain
    claim "Corrected two-dimensional representation and field L'" (sections/04-height.tex:856-899) lies outside the recorded proof; a second proof or an appendix
  • info
    structure_uncertain
    claim "r_2 is modular from a weight-two newform" (sections/04-height.tex:901-979) lies outside the recorded proof; a second proof or an appendix
  • info
    structure_uncertain
    claim "Modular Jacobian height polynomial in N" (sections/04-height.tex:1205-1230) lies outside the recorded proof; a second proof or an appendix
  • info
    structure_uncertain
    claim "Faltings height of A polynomial in M via isogeny" (sections/04-height.tex:1232-1297) lies outside the recorded proof; a second proof or an appendix