claimroutineinferred_dep
Enlarged noise preserves small change probability
Resampling one copy keeps change probability , with rational noise
gives the small-change property of the lemma
Statement (paper)
Let be the law on obtained by choosing a uniform , updating only the copy of indexed by by an independent sample from , and passing to the quotient. Then for independent uniform and we have , which is Equation , and is a rational probability distribution.
In plain English
Let be the noise on that picks a uniform injection , resamples only the -indexed copy of from , and passes to the quotient. Then for independent uniform and , and is rational.
Why it's here
The noise touches only one copy of , so the change probability of equals the base gadget's change probability , which the base-gadget claim bounds by . This transfers the small-change bound to the enlarged space built with the equivariant map , giving the small-change property of the parent lemma, and is rational because it is a finite mixture of rational distributions.
Classified routine:
Direct consequence of the earlier claims: the enlarged noise touches a single copy of , so by the equivariant-map construction (claim-lem-latent-2) the change probability reduces to the base gadget's , which claim-lem-latent-1 bounds by . Rationality holds because is a finite uniform mixture of rational distributions.
Uses
Used by
Nothing in the paper
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §3.5 Quotients and enlargement
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/02-latent.tex:701
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Enlarged noise preserves small change probability" rests on claim-lem-latent-1
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Enlarged noise preserves small change probability" rests on claim-lem-latent-2